Flywheel

Discussion of technical issues and ideas (engine, chassis)

Moderators: P3g4sus, Daniel, rat, Draco, Riekert

User avatar
Enzio
0.9 Bar Boost
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:30 am
Car: S13
Location: Pretoria

Flywheel

Post by Enzio »

Hey guys,
I was wondering how many of you use lightened flywheels? Do they work well with the CA18 and if so how much lighter than std should it be?
HancoB
SX Forumholic
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:49 am

Post by HancoB »

Uhm...well that wont make sense to me since the CA18DET already have no torque below 3000rpm, and then getting a lighter fly which means that it needs more revs to make more torque...so if i'm thinking right here it will mean that you have to pull away at every traffic light in boost????

Gary??
VC??

What do you say?
User avatar
Gary57
Club Rep
Posts: 5975
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:56 pm
Car: S13
Location: Durban

Post by Gary57 »

Yes the CA18 have no torque. My flywheel is so light that I have a lumpy idle below 1000rpm, its idles at 800rpm but at 14:1 AFR. Yes the lighten flywheel makes the motor feel gutless but definately makes it rev quicker. I would still do it every day of the week.
DriftZ: "I swear if a CA18 beats my SR im getting a RB!"
User avatar
Enzio
0.9 Bar Boost
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:30 am
Car: S13
Location: Pretoria

Post by Enzio »

So gary, how much lighter is your flywheel than std??
User avatar
Trance101
0.9 Bar Boost
Posts: 964
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:54 pm
Car: S13
Engine: RB
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Durban

Post by Trance101 »

I got my flywheel lightened and it makes quite a difference. Sure you sacrifice a bit of low down torque but the motor just love to rev with the lightented fly wheel. Good mod I think. Mine is 3kg's lighter.
RB25 S13 - in a perpetual state of broken-ness...
User avatar
Gary57
Club Rep
Posts: 5975
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:56 pm
Car: S13
Location: Durban

Post by Gary57 »

Mine is about 5Kgs off hey, I could find someone who would remove that much from Trance's, everyone said its not safe.
DriftZ: "I swear if a CA18 beats my SR im getting a RB!"
User avatar
Doctor G
0.7 Bar Boost
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 6:48 am

Post by Doctor G »

how much does a std ca18 flywheel weigh?

Any less/more than a SR flywheel?

I'd love to see a back to back dyno chart. I don't totally buy the loss in torque theories when it comes to lightened flywheels...
HancoB
SX Forumholic
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:49 am

Post by HancoB »

Its kinda true hay, there is a loss.

Ask Gary, its got a lot to do with Rotational Kinematics and Rotational Dynamics and momentum.

Basic Physics.
User avatar
Gary57
Club Rep
Posts: 5975
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:56 pm
Car: S13
Location: Durban

Post by Gary57 »

A flywheel doesnt make torque hey, it just retains it. So you will feel less torque when you going say up a a hill, so just put your foot down a bit more.

You will have a drop in torque because when the motor falls off its torque curve the flywheel doesnt have enough inertia to release so you feel a drop in torque.
DriftZ: "I swear if a CA18 beats my SR im getting a RB!"
HancoB
SX Forumholic
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:49 am

Post by HancoB »

Lets make it easy for them to understand, its like a pendulum without the weight at the bottom, then its not gonna move from side to side or if it does its gonna move a little and a lot of force will be needed to move it.
User avatar
Pinkfluffybunnys
Over Boosting
Posts: 1693
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:21 pm
Car: Other
Engine: SR
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Pretoria

Post by Pinkfluffybunnys »

Lets make it easy for them to understand, its like a pendulum without the weight at the bottom, then its not gonna move from side to side or if it does its gonna move a little and a lot of force will be needed to move it.
Agreed lets make it easyier, Thanks
http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/7177/flywheel.html

accelerating a vehicle the engine not only has to push the total mass of the car but the internal components of the engine need to be accelerated also. This tends to absorb more power as the extra power is used accelerating the internal mass of the engine components and is why a motor accelerating on a dyno will produce less power than at constant revs. Also it must be remembered that the rate of acceleration on the engine internals is much greater that the rest of the car. This would then suggest that by lightening the flywheel, less power would be required to accelerate it and therefore more power would be available to push the car along.


Now, it may seen unbelievable that by removing a few kilos from the flywheel a noticeable difference to a 1000+ kg cars acceleration will be made. In fact the difference is quite noticeable and the secrete behind this is hidden within the gearbox. Everyone knows that cars accelerate at a greater rate in low gears, this is because a cars gear box basically a mechanical leaver and just like when using a leaver to lift a heavy object, the gearbox reduces the mass of the car that the engine sees. For example, in first gear an engine will see the cars mass as only around say 100kg but the engine internal mass would still remain around 20+kg .


It is now easier to see were the extra performance comes from when you lighten a flywheel. In some cases, and not necessarily extreme ones, you could effectively " lighten " a car by 20% in first gear just by removing mass from the flywheel. As the gear used increases this "lightening" effect is reduced. This is why carÉs acceleration reduces in higher gears, to almost no effect in top gear. Great for drags and tight race tracks but will not increase a cars top speed one bit.


For the engineers among us.

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=160968
2008 Mazda 6 MPS - Daily Drive
1\4 Mile:
1993 Nissan Sentra 200STI SR20VE – Mild VE
1\4 mile: 14.815 @153km\h @ ODI --- 1KM:195Km\h

Because Race Car
HancoB
SX Forumholic
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:49 am

Post by HancoB »

The post master is back :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
mario_200sx
200SX Maniac
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 9:16 am
Car: S13
Location: Cape Town

Post by mario_200sx »

CA18DET weighs in at around 13kg, correct me if Im wrong. And I believe the SR flywheel is lighter, dont have a exact number for the SR20
Rolling Thunder..........
User avatar
Gary57
Club Rep
Posts: 5975
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:56 pm
Car: S13
Location: Durban

Post by Gary57 »

Yeah I also think its about 13kg, TOO damn heavy I know that.
DriftZ: "I swear if a CA18 beats my SR im getting a RB!"
User avatar
Pinkfluffybunnys
Over Boosting
Posts: 1693
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:21 pm
Car: Other
Engine: SR
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Pretoria

Post by Pinkfluffybunnys »

The post master is back
I just couldn't stay away.
2008 Mazda 6 MPS - Daily Drive
1\4 Mile:
1993 Nissan Sentra 200STI SR20VE – Mild VE
1\4 mile: 14.815 @153km\h @ ODI --- 1KM:195Km\h

Because Race Car
Post Reply