4 port vs 8 port

Discussion of technical issues and ideas (engine, chassis)

Moderators: P3g4sus, Daniel, rat, Draco, Riekert

User avatar
Gary57
Club Rep
Posts: 5975
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:56 pm
Car: S13
Location: Durban

4 port vs 8 port

Post by Gary57 »

Ok so I swapped my Unichip for a CA18DET motor :lol: , now the motor is an import 8 port. Everyone says the 4 port has better flow, does anyone have anything to back this up?? Remember I am not looking peak power (Im not a dyno junky, number mean nothing to me), but more midrange torque. This is my everyday car so lowdown - midrange torque is what I am after, but I also dont want to restrict the motor at higher rpm. Would the 8 port be a restriction over 1 Bar??

@ Phinx, what flow work did you do to your head and intake manifold??
User avatar
jon
0.7 Bar Boost
Posts: 758
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:05 pm
Car: S13
Location: Midrand

Post by jon »

Courtesy of Wiki, in case you haven't read this already. No, I can't back this info up but it is the closest I could get to an un-biased comparison.

"There were 2 versions of the CA18DET available, yet only one was produced for Japan. The late model Japanese CA18DETs received 8 port (low port) heads, with butterfly actuated auxiliary ports in the lower intake manifold which corresponded with 8 ports in the head. Below ~3800 rpms, only one set (4 ports open, 1 per cylinder) of long, narrow ports would be open, accelerating the intake charge to the cylinder. This allowed for quick spool and good low end tractibility. At the 3800 rpm change over, not only would the ECCS shift into batch fire (as opposed to sequential) fuel injection, but it also opened the second set of short, wide ports (8 ports open, 2 per cylinder) which assisted in high RPM flow. This motor is known for stronger torque characteristics, as well as faster spool at lower RPMs. However, due to displacement-based taxation and cost of emissions testing in Europe, the CA18DET was sold as the only available engine in the S13 chassis 200SX (Euro model) until replaced by the S14 in 1994. The Euro motors received the 4 port (high port) head and intake manifold, as well as revised ECCS ("Electronic Concentrated Control System") parameters. Power was not increased, but high RPM flow was indeed improved, making the 4 port CA18DET the most desirable of the late generation Nissan turbo 4s. Due to superior head design (cam on bucket, as opposed to the complex and heavy rocker arm actuation of later motors like the SR and QR), many enthusiasts consider the CA18DET to be the best engine platform since the FJ20ET that powered the legendary DR30 Skyline DOHC-RS."
Diesel power, hmm, yes, I think I'll have some of that.
User avatar
Phinx
0.7 Bar Boost
Posts: 720
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Car: S13
Location: Pretoria

Post by Phinx »

Some Nice 8 port info…

Basic Theory of Operation of the 8 Port
The amount of fuel and air sucked/forced into a cylinder is dictated by several factors, one of which is charge velocity. Higher velocity means more gets in. At low RPMs, you usually aren't generating much boost, and since you don't have much displacement, you're not sucking much either. A larger opening lets the charge in slower, a smaller one faster. Think of a garden hose: just holding the hose out, the water comes out at a decent rate, but it's in no real hurry. Press your thumb over the opening to restrict the exit area, and flow velocity must increase, for flow to be maintained. At some point, you are restricting total theoretical flow, but at lower flow levels, this will cause a higher exit velocity. The same is true with the CA18DET's secondary butterfly system. At lower airflow points (i.e. RPM), the butterflies are closed, forcing nearly all intake charge to go through half the space, increasing its velocity into the cylinder and therefore the rate at which the cylinder fills. More charge = more power, all else being equal.


CA18DET Secondary Butterflies Control System
The secondary butterflies are controlled via a vacuum operated actuator that sits on the back end of the intake manifold. When there is a vacuum, the butterflies are closed, and when there is no vacuum, are allowed to open. When correctly hooked up, this is controlled via the ECU for (presumably) optimal operation. The stock system uses a fairly complicated arrangement of gizmos, which I will cover towards the end. There are many ways to hook up this system. I'll start with the simplest.

Method 0: Do Nothing (WRONG way)
This is the worst method, i.e. not hooking it up at all. You get no benefits at all, and potentially some losses vs. not having the butterflies at all.
Method 1: The Simple way
This is the bare minimum anyone should do, and is very straightforward. Basically, you connect it to the intake manifold such that it sees vacuum and boost directly. As described above, when there's vacuum it'll pull the butterflies closed, and when there's no vacuum or boost, it'll let them open. This is not necessarily optimal, and from multiple accounts, is nowhere near as good as the correct way of hooking it up. You can either dedicate one of the vacuum ports to this, or T it in with something else (i.e. the FPR).
Method 2: The Stock ("Correct") Way
This is how it should be done, if you're running a stock ECU. By stock I mean OEM type engine control, retuned ECUs inclusive. This is quite complicated. The ECU controls the butterflies by turning a solenoid on and off. When on, they close, and when off, they open. This is achieved by connecting (when on) the butterflies to a vacuum source, and then when off, connecting them to a vent to ambient air pressure.
In detail, the vacuum source comes off the intake manifold, goes through a vacuum delay valve (possibly check valve), into a vacuum tank, then to the solenoid, then another vacuum delay valve (they’re to smooth the on/off transition) and finally into the actuator. The solenoid also has a connection running around to the intake side of the engine, behind the MAF, before the turbo, where it "dumps" the vacuum when the butterflies are switched off. The first valve may be a check valve (makes more sense), but the parts catalog in all regions has it listed "delay", whilst the FSM says "check" - and "check" also for the other valve, which can't be right or it would never release the actuator! Use the OEM parts and you won't have to care.
What happens is that due to the vacuum check valve built into the vacuum tank, the engine is always pulling a vacuum, or at least, not "venting" the vacuum, from the vacuum tank. This keeps it ready to go, all the time, in theory. After the tank, we have the solenoid. This is the one the ECU controls. When the solenoid is on, the butterflies are continuously held in vacuum by the vacuum tank. When off, the solenoid shunts the vacuum in the actuator and it's vacuum hose to the ambient air pressure by the intake, which releases the vacuum and opens the butterflies. Between the manifold and the vacuum tank, and also between the actuator and the solenoid, are vacuum delay valves. You could live without the valves, they’re just there to smooth things out. They merely restrict airflow to make the pressure changes in the system less sudden..
Like I said, it's complicated. It also takes up a lot of space in the engine bay...

Image

Thank you to biosehnsucht and the NICO Club





Now this sounds really great doesn’t it, Higher port velocity increased “VE” everyone’s happy but there are two problems first off , I have personally seen around six “8 port CA18DET” swaps but I have never seen the control solenoid for the Butterfly’s also above this in order to use the Solenoids you will need the “jap” harness and ECU.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not attacking anyone. I have come to accept that I will also not win the 8 Port Vs 4 port debut, yes in theory you can gain extra low to maybe midrange torque but how much? And at what loss on the top-end?

Also now if the system was so great why wasn’t it more widely spread? Why Didn’t the RB or SR20 OR hell even the Sr16 use the same system?
Yes! Toyota used the system in the 4age but it’s the first thing they disable when pushing for ponies and its not used in the 20 Valves.
It’s not used in the 4G63 or in the 13B /12a that could use some low down torque

Because restricting intake flow and long runners work great on truck motor or pulling motor, to increase your port speeds and VE at a RPM. For example a bakkie for towing, my dad has the same system on his 1300 cc rustler but that thing can’t really rev past 5500rpm

It all because as soon as you revs climb past 5000 RPM the small ports and the butterflies (even when up) act like a restriction now why would you want this on a motor with a 7200 RPM ceiling?



But Now I hear you say, in theory small intake ports assist in VE and cylinder fill!

Yes! Small port designs are used in high performance N/A motors , Like Bikes and B16 (Vtec) and the S2000 where you want to keep the port speed up and growing as you climb into the higher RPM bands to increase VE but these motors can REV to 8000 RPM without batting an eye and that where they make there power.

But our cars are “boosted”, We don’t need to try and keep the ports speed up, The air is there with more pressure then any Honda could dream of about 0,5 bars of it. We just need to force as much of this air through the small ports we have into the Cylinder.

Now really it all boils down to what you fell and think is best, I have left some thing out of this because I’m to lazy to type anymore.
But I’m not attacking anyone just my point of view…
A.K.A - Wonderboy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1993 Nissan 200 SX
148 Kw - 250 NM @ 0.55 bar. 1.8T ATW
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1989 Toyota Corrola
63kw - 117nm 1.3- N/A
18.2 @118,4 Km - Rainbow Raceway
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
Riekert
The Overlord
Posts: 9505
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:51 pm
Car: S13
Engine: VQ
Real Name: Riekert
Location: Hermanus/Cape Town
Contact:

Post by Riekert »

Image
Enzio wrote:Who needs ligths? When you're going sideways forward facing lights don't do anything but confuse squirrels and sheep next to the road...


aka The Overlord
User avatar
Speed breeder
0.7 Bar Boost
Posts: 741
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:19 pm
Car: S13
Location: Roodepoort

Post by Speed breeder »

Always wondered about the butterfly story...

Cool write up and research dudes...
200sx CA18DET S13 - forged and flowed
User avatar
Gary57
Club Rep
Posts: 5975
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:56 pm
Car: S13
Location: Durban

Post by Gary57 »

Thanks for that post Phinx.

So is the 8 port head different to the 4 port head or is it just the intake system??

My turbo spools up very quickly, 0.8Bar at 2800rpm, but I still dont have huge low down torque. Yes if I wasnt so lazy and spent less time cleaning my car and more time with the Wolf I could get that torque. I could run that fancy butterfly system off the Wolf but what a mission. Beside when I rebuild the motor I want more boost, maybe 1.2Bar, and at that boost I think they will be a restriction.

Has anyone put these two head on a flow bench??
User avatar
Phinx
0.7 Bar Boost
Posts: 720
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Car: S13
Location: Pretoria

Post by Phinx »

Yep the heads are not the same, If you pull the intake off your Spare you will see what I mean

I have been looking through my “Old tech pages” Both heads where compared on a flow bench on an AUZ site.
If I remember correctly the 8 Port flow a little less then the 4 port but as soon as the intake system was added the numbers really dropped for the 8 port.

But I cant find the damn site so I don’t have the Proof
A.K.A - Wonderboy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1993 Nissan 200 SX
148 Kw - 250 NM @ 0.55 bar. 1.8T ATW
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1989 Toyota Corrola
63kw - 117nm 1.3- N/A
18.2 @118,4 Km - Rainbow Raceway
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
Gary57
Club Rep
Posts: 5975
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:56 pm
Car: S13
Location: Durban

Post by Gary57 »

Ah damn so this head is no good for me then, I tought only the intakes were different.

How would the flows compare if I put the 4 port intake on the 8 port head.
veecee
AGENT SX!
Posts: 7354
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 3:49 pm

Post by veecee »

wont fit!
ReeceZ wrote:I'm sorry... I couldn't help it. Please no one wish any hateful shit on me, I own an SX already
User avatar
Draco
Forum Whore
Posts: 5723
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:32 am
Car: S13
Location: Olifantsfontein

Post by Draco »

Below ~3800 rpms, only one set (4 ports open, 1 per cylinder) of long, narrow ports would be open, accelerating the intake charge to the cylinder. This allowed for quick spool and good low end tractibility. At the 3800 rpm change over, not only would the ECCS shift into batch fire (as opposed to sequential) fuel injection, but it also opened the second set of short, wide ports (8 ports open, 2 per cylinder) which assisted in high RPM flow.
I have been thinking about this.....what this means then the way I understand it is that if you disconnect the actuator of the system only 4 butterflies are open, halfing your intake volume.....this means since I disconnected it, I don't get as much air in there as I should or rather I have a huge restriction because 4 butterflies are closed and does not open because it is not opened by the boost pressure after a certain revs, in theory, if it is connected then power should increase from where it is now because of flowwwww...... I connected it again to see if there would be a diffs....I will post as soon as I have a comment.
User avatar
Phinx
0.7 Bar Boost
Posts: 720
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:30 pm
Car: S13
Location: Pretoria

Post by Phinx »

You had them completly disconnected? :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
A.K.A - Wonderboy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1993 Nissan 200 SX
148 Kw - 250 NM @ 0.55 bar. 1.8T ATW
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1989 Toyota Corrola
63kw - 117nm 1.3- N/A
18.2 @118,4 Km - Rainbow Raceway
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
Gary57
Club Rep
Posts: 5975
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:56 pm
Car: S13
Location: Durban

Post by Gary57 »

If you had them completely disconected but the butterflies were open then you should of been fine.
User avatar
Draco
Forum Whore
Posts: 5723
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:32 am
Car: S13
Location: Olifantsfontein

Post by Draco »

Phinx wrote:You had them completly disconnected? :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
Yes I did....... :shock: :shock: :shock:

Gary.....as far as i know the butterflies has a spring on....it needs boost to open it and the spring closes it assisted by the vacuum....so if there is no "boost" it will remain closed....
User avatar
Gary57
Club Rep
Posts: 5975
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:56 pm
Car: S13
Location: Durban

Post by Gary57 »

Oh ok, so if you were only running the motor through 4 small ports you should get a huge power gain when you open the other 4 up.
User avatar
Draco
Forum Whore
Posts: 5723
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:32 am
Car: S13
Location: Olifantsfontein

Post by Draco »

Gary57 wrote:Oh ok, so if you were only running the motor through 4 small ports you should get a huge power gain when you open the other 4 up.
My point exactly.....that is if the technical theory of how it works is correct
Post Reply