Page 1 of 1
My new turbo setup
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:44 am
by Vlade
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:11 pm
by Gary57
Aftermarket sequential setup...NICE
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:09 pm
by veecee
hectic!!!
the poor CA18's have enough problems with a pissy little T25!!! then they go and do that!!!
EISH!!!!
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:58 am
by widowmaker
if you go a level up to
http://200sx.kicks-ass.net - gazillions of sx pics... nice!
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:25 am
by jon
Welcome to lag
Looks awesome but I'm guessing it's not too usable on the street which would be a bummer.
Those swedes are freaking crazy, gotta respect that
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:35 pm
by WooHaa
jon wrote:Welcome to lag
Looks awesome but I'm guessing it's not too usable on the street which would be a bummer.
Those swedes are freaking crazy, gotta respect that
I disagree.
A sequntial setup is all about getting rid of lag. Small turbo spools up early & the bigger one, spools up at the higher and of the rpm band.
Its not the best for outright power, because the smaller turbo starts to hold the bigger one back.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:46 pm
by widowmaker
thats what the third turbo is for
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:12 pm
by Stephen Swanepoel
Is all this not evedance to the fact that the next generation of turbos should have the ability to vary the pitch on the blades of the turbo. (eg. turbine props on aircraft)
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:24 pm
by veecee
WooHaa wrote:jon wrote:Welcome to lag
Looks awesome but I'm guessing it's not too usable on the street which would be a bummer.
Those swedes are freaking crazy, gotta respect that
I disagree.
A sequntial setup is all about getting rid of lag. Small turbo spools up early & the bigger one, spools up at the higher and of the rpm band.
Its not the best for outright power, because the smaller turbo starts to hold the bigger one back.
i disagree - because the small turbo on this setup already looks big enough to cause heavy lag. drive an sx with anything bigger than a t28, boost comes in way over 4000.
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:48 pm
by jon
I agree with veecee on this one, those are not small turbos by any means
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 6:24 pm
by widowmaker
maybe its just one of them ultra-zoom cameras
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:58 pm
by Speed breeder
Lag may be a huge problem... But then exercise was done in futility. Why do a twin sequential turbo setup, if one turbo is not to decrease the lag??
here the first turbo does look a bit big to achieve lower rpm spool up.
I would then have just smacked on one big turbo to make huge power...
This setup doesn't make sense...
