Page 5 of 5
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:04 am
by veecee
its the only place i could think of getting a decent pic. but i've seen a few like that before.
just wondering!???!
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:59 am
by Vlade
ja also wondering how that will affect the air... but again... slap on a huge turbo and worry about efficiency later

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:04 pm
by veecee
nah i wasnt too much about efficiency, i was just wondering about cylinder air starvation!
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 2:47 pm
by widowmaker
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 2:58 pm
by veecee
widow, i'm sure if you tried hard enough you could be smart too!!!
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:02 pm
by 200SXSilviaSavage
What's up guys!

. I've just joined like now, so what's up

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:07 pm
by veecee
whats up, savage, is that this is a discussion of the theory of intake manifolds!!!
yours seems to be an attempt at introduction.
a good place to do that is in the chat thread, or the lounge thread...
thats wassup YO!
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:49 pm
by widowmaker
dejavudejavudejavu
savage confuses us
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:49 pm
by The Calibrator
Not sure what dejavu is but I keep getting the feeling that this has happened before.
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:47 am
by veecee
all this off topic crap, and no-one has answered my damn question yet???
so i guess its a stupid question then.
so i will repeat it.
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:48 am
by veecee
veecee wrote:speaking of those RB motors.
the RB25det in its natural form has a intake that comes over the tappet covers.
and if you look closely the runners are all different lengths.
so the design from the factory has been tried and tested and it works right?
but there are people who do the swop into their s13's, and then move the throttle butterfly from the middle of the plenum to the side that faces the radiator. i know its easier and cheaper than lowering the engine to make it fit, or than buying a Greddy manifold for instance, but does it have a detrimental affect on the engine breathing???
are there some cylinders that might get more air than others???
here's pics, first of an original, and second of the mod i am talking about.
over the tappet covers:
new intake position:

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:25 pm
by 200SXSilviaSavage
Is there a hectic difference between fitting a dual-cone air filter and a mushroom air filter??? Which one is better and why???
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:58 am
by 200SXSilviaSavage
Is there a hectic difference between fitting a dual-cone air filter and a mushroom air filter??? Which one is better and why???
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:03 am
by veecee
200SXSilviaSavage wrote:Is there a hectic difference between fitting a dual-cone air filter and a mushroom air filter??? Which one is better and why???
people are ignoring you because this is not really the right place to ask this question!
air filters have been discussed plenty in the past - try this:
http://200sx.za.net/phpBB2/search.php
search for air filters, simota, cone filter, k&n, BMC, etc.
or start your own thread with your question on!