
small difference?
Moderators: P3g4sus, Daniel, rat, Draco, Riekert
- Vlade
- * - Club Pimp - *
- Posts: 2776
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:40 am
- Car: Other
- Real Name: Barend
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Last government place I contracted for was had such an slacked IT department that I hosted my own website on there servers for 2 years without them knowing, even after I left I could still terminal into my desktop never mind the servers... check my mail... lekker slap gat.
Any way we high jacking his thread.
Any way we high jacking his thread.
Hairdresser MX5
before/after
The car was supposedly tjooned by Gavin Wilkins before I got her. It was running lean though.Hennie Marais wrote:Do you have the before and after A/F ratio graphs too.
Was the car dynoed before or is this with a new installation, firsttime dyno and then tuning,
-
- 0.3 Bar Boost
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:23 am
- Car: S13
- Location: Rustenburg
I don't doubt that. Fact is he was the previous tuner of this car and it was running lean from day 1. Now its possible he was never given the budget to keep it in a better condition or the owner just didn't care or notice, but the point is it was already tuned to a certain degree before I gave it to Calibrator.Hennie Marais wrote:Gavin Wilkins is a V8 guru and very good guy.
I personally never met Gavin but I am a fan of his Sierra [even though its a ford].
-
- 0.4 Bar Boost
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:36 am
- Car: S13
-
- 0.3 Bar Boost
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:23 am
- Car: S13
- Location: Rustenburg
ok, If I've got it correct, the 128kw is before the upgrades, how does the rest of the graphs follow, 162, 167, 177.
I see the 167kw graph looks a lot like the 128kw one if you look at the "shape" of it. so it looks more like it was the 2nd one
The curve of the 162 is smooth, al lot smoother than the 177 one.
I would still like to see the AF ratio of the 4 so that I can finalise my opinion.
I see the 167kw graph looks a lot like the 128kw one if you look at the "shape" of it. so it looks more like it was the 2nd one
The curve of the 162 is smooth, al lot smoother than the 177 one.
I would still like to see the AF ratio of the 4 so that I can finalise my opinion.
There are two dyno sheets, the first one has two runs, 128.7kw/162.7kw; ATW before/after upgrades.Hennie Marais wrote:ok, If I've got it correct, the 128kw is before the upgrades, how does the rest of the graphs follow, 162, 167, 177.
I see the 167kw graph looks a lot like the 128kw one if you look at the "shape" of it. so it looks more like it was the 2nd one
The curve of the 162 is smooth, al lot smoother than the 177 one.
I would still like to see the AF ratio of the 4 so that I can finalise my opinion.
The second sheet with 177kw on the engine was taken with the upgrades but with only 0.5bar boost. I'm guessing I've surpassed the 200kw mark at the engine by quite a bit at 0.7bar

Hennie I'll post some AFR stuff when my VEMS is fitted, that will also give EGT stats.
I am also going to have the clutch changed, if I can have my way calibrator won't be having much of a weekend

I wonder if just the clutch will change the ATW figure of 162.7!?
Last edited by qewrty on Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.