707 RWHP Skyline dyno chart

Hennie Marais · Post by **Hennie Marais** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:31 am

hmmm, from 520 flywheel kw to 540 wheel kw, must be a typo or some major boosting.

Daniel · Post by **Daniel** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:41 am

Ja i saw it at Tarlton yesterday, awsome!!!

there where some quick cars there. i've so fallen inlove with a Lotus now, have to get a Exige or something and stick a leke turbo motor in

veecee · Post by **veecee** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:45 am

Hennie Marais wrote:hmmm, from 520 flywheel kw to 540 wheel kw, must be a typo or some major boosting.

i think the typo might be in my head!!!

sorry - not paying too much attention as usual!

Hennie Marais · Post by **Hennie Marais** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:46 am

naww, the movie says wkw.

veecee · Post by **veecee** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:50 am

cool - i'm off the hook then.

and i dont mean caraaazzzyyy-boy off the hook!!!!!

n1smo200sx · Post by **n1smo200sx** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:57 am

Best time ws a 10.6 at 222km/h.
Does ANYONE know what it takes to go from a 11s to 10s Qmile.......
obviously not.

Hennie Marais · Post by **Hennie Marais** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:06 am

ja, NOS

Rezlo · Post by **Rezlo** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:10 am

Hennie Marais wrote:ja, NOS

lol, NAWWWS FTW!

ohh dont forget traction, the reason the 11 second PE cars run 10's in JHB! as documented with 3 different cars all running the same setup at both altitudes.

SlowMo · Post by **SlowMo** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:11 am

we all know in an ideal situation, with perfect launch, perfect traction, perfect gearshifts, it will take a lot to drop 1 second. Unfortunately, we not NHRA racers here, and none of these factors are ever perfect. So with just a little better traction you can shave off large chunks of time, for example, guys at the coast dropping about 6 tengths when they run in jhb, just because of better traction. SnS have docemented this as well.

Draco · Post by **Draco** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:19 am

traction and all that is a big part of the game, in the end any car in 11's and 10's have my respect....

veecee · Post by **veecee** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:24 am

Rezlo wrote:
Hennie Marais wrote:ja, NOS
lol, NAWWWS FTW!

hahaha - ROFLOL.

reminds me of a buddy who always screams at the top of his lungs at drag meets:

EEEEETTTTTSSSSS GGGGGAAAAWWWWTTTTTT GGGGGAAAAASSSSSS!!!!!

LOL.

and i agree fully with dracobooi!!!!

Shaheenk · Post by **Shaheenk** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:10 pm

Thats a frighting quick car, Twin turbo set up still. so not single big ass turbo, ran quicker then the time with his old car.

he is currently busy with 2 other sylines which should be just as strong, if not stronger.

Trance101 · Post by **Trance101** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:22 pm

Wow, thats quick for a first time out.

So where is the vid of the 10s run? ...

Gary57 · Post by **Gary57** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:23 pm

What would a motor like cost??

veecee · Post by **veecee** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:28 pm

quite a bit of money i would assume!

dont you remember the pic of the, and i quote, "most beautiful engine i've seen!!!"

many very expensive goodies in there!