Project - Damn CA
Moderators: P3g4sus, Daniel, rat, Draco, Riekert
-
- 0.3 Bar Boost
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:23 am
- Car: S13
- Location: Rustenburg
-
- 0.3 Bar Boost
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:23 am
- Car: S13
- Location: Rustenburg
-
- 0.3 Bar Boost
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:23 am
- Car: S13
- Location: Rustenburg
- widowmaker
- 200SX Maniac
- Posts: 3052
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:50 am
- Car: S13
- Real Name: Walter
- Location: im from another planet?
- Contact:
- widowmaker
- 200SX Maniac
- Posts: 3052
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:50 am
- Car: S13
- Real Name: Walter
- Location: im from another planet?
- Contact:
**** Update****
Hi guys here are some updated pictures of the R&D fitment.
Intake Removed
------------------------
Test Fits
-----------------------
---------
---------
--------
Blurry Pic of the Port
-------------------------------
Problem Area's
-----------------------------
The Water line running under the intake need to be re-routed
Quick question to all the guys on the fourm there is a Pipe leading from the thermostat intake manifold (Pic 1) under the old intake to copper hard line under the intake (pic 2) .
Can this Pipe be removed and If not why?
I know it could be a water cycle but my thermostat says partially open so can it be discarded
Thankz
(Pic 1)
(Pic 2)
Hi guys here are some updated pictures of the R&D fitment.
Intake Removed
------------------------
Test Fits
-----------------------
---------
---------
--------
Blurry Pic of the Port
-------------------------------
Problem Area's
-----------------------------
The Water line running under the intake need to be re-routed
Quick question to all the guys on the fourm there is a Pipe leading from the thermostat intake manifold (Pic 1) under the old intake to copper hard line under the intake (pic 2) .
Can this Pipe be removed and If not why?
I know it could be a water cycle but my thermostat says partially open so can it be discarded
Thankz
(Pic 1)
(Pic 2)
A.K.A - Wonderboy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1993 Nissan 200 SX
148 Kw - 250 NM @ 0.55 bar. 1.8T ATW
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1989 Toyota Corrola
63kw - 117nm 1.3- N/A
18.2 @118,4 Km - Rainbow Raceway
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1993 Nissan 200 SX
148 Kw - 250 NM @ 0.55 bar. 1.8T ATW
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1989 Toyota Corrola
63kw - 117nm 1.3- N/A
18.2 @118,4 Km - Rainbow Raceway
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- widowmaker
- 200SX Maniac
- Posts: 3052
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:50 am
- Car: S13
- Real Name: Walter
- Location: im from another planet?
- Contact:
i'll go have a good look at it in the morning, but i think the copper pipe feeds the turbo - so dont remove that.
as for the smaller pipe - not sure now - but i will return soon with an answer.
as for the smaller pipe - not sure now - but i will return soon with an answer.
ReeceZ wrote:I'm sorry... I couldn't help it. Please no one wish any hateful shit on me, I own an SX already
oh ja - i think that manifold is hotcakes!
my order will be in soon!
you think it can be made so that it gives more low down torque than the stock manifold??? i dont want top end, cos i need lots of power from as early as possible - and i dont want to make my sx a turbodiesel!!!
my order will be in soon!
you think it can be made so that it gives more low down torque than the stock manifold??? i dont want top end, cos i need lots of power from as early as possible - and i dont want to make my sx a turbodiesel!!!
ReeceZ wrote:I'm sorry... I couldn't help it. Please no one wish any hateful shit on me, I own an SX already