Page 4 of 5
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 7:54 am
by Vlade
*** Vlade's face is stuffed with popcorn ***
![200SX_cool2 [smilie=200sx_cool2.gif]](./images/smilies/200SX_cool2.gif)
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:43 am
by Gary57
***gary sits back and enjoys tg popcorn with vlade***
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:50 am
by Gary57
lets just stop the arguing, i know what power the car make and it goes, i couldnt give a rats ass if none of u believe me. phinx i invite u when u next in dbn to come for a drive and ill show u how it goes, maybe freddie would like to come with and report back to you? in the mean time the next best thing i will do is video a run from 0-200kmh and u decide, last time i did it it took about 14secs. anything more i cant say nor care if u believe me or not.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:03 am
by The Calibrator
. Also "cowboy" If you have the T-shirt post the flow maps yourself and prove him right.
Brave words from behind a keyboard.
1st I didnt say he is right or wrong I have no interest in the argument except for the fact that as a know fuckall pimply youth you are very quick to tell people who are doing stuff you can only dreanm about that they are wrong.
Now my little friend a warning.
I do not allow children to speak to me like that and you have used up all my allowance for the impetuosity of youth.
I suggest that you lay off the personal insults before you really annoy me.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:05 am
by Vlade
I believe you... Had the same issue when I told people I hit an accidental 1.1 bar with a T25

But it was a modified T25
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:05 am
by Sokar
Sokar: Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:41 am wrote:You will yak a bit, he will yak a bit, callibrator will yak a bit, you will yak some more, he will yak some more, one or 2 other guys from the forums will yak a little bit inbetween and we'll see if we can get this post to 12 pages......
Look Gary, I can predict the future!!!
I think at this point Gary, if you're happy with your setup and the way its running and if its running reliably then its cool. Those figures are impressive and if you do Dyno it again one day I'd like to see the graph, it would be interesting to see the shape etc. The dyno "should" also show IF you're pushing the turbo waaayyy out of its efficiency range. Pushing a turbo a little isnt a bad thing, just have some bucks spare to service/rebuild it in case, I learnt that the hard way

Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:31 am
by Phinx
LOL
Brave words from behind a keyboard.
1st I didn't say he is right or wrong I have no interest in the argument except for the fact that as a know fuckall pimply youth you are very quick to tell people who are doing stuff you can only dreanm about that they are wrong.
Now my little friend a warning.
I do not allow children to speak to me like that and you have used up all my allowance for the impetuosity of youth.
I suggest that you lay off the personal insults before you really annoy me.
(Yawn)
Ok Fine after speaking with Sokar your right ,
To avoided and argument and name calling like "Toby" requested in a previous post it makes the forum look bad and that why I said "sorry" in the previous post if i sounded rude.
I lay down my arms but please:
People just please think for yourselves stop being lazy and believing everything you hear, Phone around, do the research, contact the people, Buy the books get your hands dirty and then when your informed make your choice.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:39 am
by Gary57
i agree phinx, i did alot of research into this setup and it is the best for me. sure i probably would make 300rwkw but i am after drivability not driftability. i would rather be the sheperd than a sheep in a hurd, sometimes majority is wrong.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:47 am
by Phinx
Post below
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:51 am
by Phinx
Thanks Gary...
If the Set-up makes you happy run with it, And I hope you get 180WKW because then your in the region of modified SR20's
It takes balls to admit you made a mistake.
I have made tons on my SX, from bending valve because I didn't read correctly to not studding the turbo correctly.
So sorry , hope it work out
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 pm
by Gary57
I hope I get the figures as well if not well doesnt really matter, beside all dynos talk KAK anyway

.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:15 pm
by Hennie Marais
what ratio turbine housing did you use
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:23 pm
by Gary57
Where did you get a flow map from?? Been searching for ages for it.
Not sure what the A/R ratio is, it should be STD TD04 what ever that is.
The car makes 180RwKw or about there (dont trust dyno's) so if you work on a 75% efficent drivetrain gives you about 240Kw ATF.
***Was busy replying to your post when you edited it, why???***
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:26 pm
by Hennie Marais
Sorry, thought it might look like I wanted to start a arguement again, so I removed it. I've got a LOT of the maps of most of the turbos, it's a must to calculate what to use.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 4:27 pm
by Gary57
Please send me the TD04H-15T one, not lieing been looking for aboit 2 years.
Sorry, thought it might look like I wanted to start a arguement again
Probably safer that way

.