Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:38 pm
Here in ct my sx made 126kw when it was std 132kw sounds like a bit more boost has been added if there are no mods
Nissan 200SX Club - South Africa
Forum for owners of the Nissan 200SX in South Africa
https://forum.sxoc.co.za/
what do ya think of this one??
Page 3 of 4
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:42 pm
My stock one with a 63mm zorst made 135kw
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:56 pm
could be, coz its running on a stock exhaust!mono wrote:Here in ct my sx made 126kw when it was std 132kw sounds like a bit more boost has been added if there are no mods
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:06 pm
Ok that 132kw can be standard.
Its not on the wheels tho, thats at the fly.
I know when we first had Jean(86)[stock s13 stock wheels and stock engine and zorst] car on the dyno it read 146kw, then some tad bit of tweaking with the fueling and timing later we ended up on 155kw.
http://200sx.za.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.ph ... ght=#37837
So it can be possible. But def not rwkw!
Its not on the wheels tho, thats at the fly.
I know when we first had Jean(86)[stock s13 stock wheels and stock engine and zorst] car on the dyno it read 146kw, then some tad bit of tweaking with the fueling and timing later we ended up on 155kw.
http://200sx.za.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.ph ... ght=#37837
So it can be possible. But def not rwkw!
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:32 pm
well, i dont know if i can compare it like this, but in the cape my friends push arround 128kw at the flywheel with their vtec, and that sx i drove 2day with the 132kw felt way faster than that, dont know if a direct comparison is possible though??
well, at least i drove a sx, so now i know a bit more about what im getting myself into!
well, at least i drove a sx, so now i know a bit more about what im getting myself into!
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:20 pm
When you do choose to mod i would def go for the exhaust first that mod pushed my power up to 150kw and its sounds awesome
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:17 am
Ja remember that honda had 128fwkw and about squat Nm torque where ass the sx has 132fwkw and 240Nm
Get what I'm saying!
Get what I'm saying!
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:23 am
HancoB wrote:Ja remember that honda had 128fwkw and about squat Nm torque where ass the sx has 132fwkw and 240Nm
Get what I'm saying!
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:28 am
yea people tend to only look at the kw and forget about the torque, and torque makes a big difference.
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:31 am
Ha ha just keeping with the cape town theme of national ass week!
Sorry ment to say "where as" but Im kinda stuck on this
and damn I like this
Sorry ment to say "where as" but Im kinda stuck on this
and damn I like this
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:33 am
Thats kinda what I just said Ero!
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:44 am
Yes thats why he is emphasising your pointHancoB wrote:Thats kinda what I just said Ero!
but yes, you can have 100000KW... and 10nm... then your going nowhere slow...
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:47 am
Well you didn't make it too clear and I was just agreeing with what you said.HancoB wrote:Thats kinda what I just said Ero!
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:41 am
thanx guys, good point, no wonder i can keep up with all the vtecs, as my 150i has been rebored and has more torque than a vtec now!! 
im awaiting some more detailed pics of rowans car and will decide this weekend, but that white one is out of the question, as the owner wants to pay me book value for my car, but expects me to pay 70K for the SX!! 
im awaiting some more detailed pics of rowans car and will decide this weekend, but that white one is out of the question, as the owner wants to pay me book value for my car, but expects me to pay 70K for the SX!!
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:18 pm
I can see his point.......if I take my head out of my ass.....nodster wrote: but that white one is out of the question, as the owner wants to pay me book value for my car, but expects me to pay 70K for the SX!!