MAF ~ Dump valve...

Discussion of technical issues and ideas (engine, chassis)

Moderators: P3g4sus, Daniel, rat, Draco, Riekert

Post Reply
User avatar
Twakkie
Slipping Clutch
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:50 pm
Car: S13

MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by Twakkie »

Okay lets see if we can get this sorted for once and for all. if you install a dump valve in a standard setup (CA) the air intake is calculated at the MAF which is located at the very beginning of the system, then if you dump that air which had already been accounted for the management system will fuel for that air as if it is there which results in temporarily over fueling causing a little black smoke puff when shifting (which looks tappet). and if you don't use a dump valve and boost over 0.8bar its hazardous to your turbo.

however i have seen motors even a CA without a MAF!? just a pipe between the turbo and the air filter. How does that work?

User avatar
rat
Administrator
Posts: 5378
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:38 am
Car: R32
Engine: RB
Real Name: Rat
Location: Margate

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by rat »

Management that uses a map sensor instead of a maf.
Hot Plates are Sexy

User avatar
Twakkie
Slipping Clutch
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:50 pm
Car: S13

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by Twakkie »

Where is the map sensor located then vs. the maf location

User avatar
Daniel
200SX Maniac
Posts: 2994
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:39 pm
Car: S13
Engine: RB
Real Name: Daniël
Location: Centurion, Pretoria

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by Daniel »

Twakkie wrote:Okay lets see if we can get this sorted for once and for all. if you install a dump valve in a standard setup (CA) the air intake is calculated at the MAF which is located at the very beginning of the system, then if you dump that air which had already been accounted for the management system will fuel for that air as if it is there which results in temporarily over fueling causing a little black smoke puff when shifting (which looks tappet).
yes
Twakkie wrote:and if you don't use a dump valve and boost over 0.8bar its hazardous to your turbo.
I know the members on this forum strongly believe that to be the case. There is lots of internet debate on this topic, I disagree that it is a problem at all, 0.8 - 1bar is not high boost. The turbo will be fine at these levels as it is not true surge, and surge is the killer. Having said that I will always recommend a recirculating BOV to somebody. IMHO of course.
Twakkie wrote:however i have seen motors even a CA without a MAF!? just a pipe between the turbo and the air filter. How does that work?
They run a MAP sensor as apposed to a MAF sensor.
sig[/sig]

User avatar
rat
Administrator
Posts: 5378
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:38 am
Car: R32
Engine: RB
Real Name: Rat
Location: Margate

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by rat »

Depends on the management but it takes a vacuum / boost from the manifold.

So dumping air doesn't affect it.
Hot Plates are Sexy

User avatar
Daniel
200SX Maniac
Posts: 2994
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:39 pm
Car: S13
Engine: RB
Real Name: Daniël
Location: Centurion, Pretoria

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by Daniel »

bah, beaten to it by a damn dirty rat :facepalm: :P :lol:
sig[/sig]

User avatar
rat
Administrator
Posts: 5378
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 10:38 am
Car: R32
Engine: RB
Real Name: Rat
Location: Margate

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by rat »

Bwahahaha.
Hot Plates are Sexy

User avatar
Twakkie
Slipping Clutch
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:50 pm
Car: S13

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by Twakkie »

AAA shot oaks!!

User avatar
300sx
0.8 Bar Boost
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:24 pm
Car: S13
Location: PTA

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by 300sx »

I know the members on this forum strongly believe that to be the case. There is lots of internet debate on this topic, I disagree that it is a problem at all, 0.8 - 1bar is not high boost. The turbo will be fine at these levels as it is not true surge, and surge is the killer. Having said that I will always recommend a recirculating BOV to somebody. IMHO of course.
agree with daniel, imho the use of a bov on a street turbo setup is very much over rated.. i personally never use them, can honestly say never noticed reduced turbo life because of a little reversion.. far more important to make sure you dont overspeed a turbo, or push it into surge due to mismatch..
300zx fairlady 1991
200sx s13 with vg30det @ 1bar

User avatar
phoenix s14
Over Boosting
Posts: 1102
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:01 pm
Car: S14
Engine: SR
Real Name: Mark Appelgryn
Location: Boksburg, Gauteng

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by phoenix s14 »

Ok I heard what everyone said but run a dump valve and recirculate it. If you dont want to do that then change the management and run a map sensor.

Better lag and turbo life when running a BOV. Low or high boost. Think to yourself - 80000rpm+ then getting stopped and back spun. Then stopped and spun the other way.... umm bearing life/ seals? thrust collars? So do it right or risk it... really your gamble with a couple of grand it could work or it couldn't.

Hope that helps... but as even veilside says: "We do not fit unnessesary equipment like BOV to our race cars but then again the turbos don't last that long due to it. But on a race car that is acceptable"

[smilie=200sx_200sx.gif]
Weight kills all the fun - Jeremy Clarkson

User avatar
300sx
0.8 Bar Boost
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:24 pm
Car: S13
Location: PTA

Re: MAF ~ Dump valve...

Post by 300sx »

Think to yourself - 80000rpm+ then getting stopped and back spun. Then stopped and spun the other way....
thats a little bit of an exageration bud.. no ways in hell that the reversion will stop the impeller, never mind spin it backwards on gearchange or even on deceleration..

:)
300zx fairlady 1991
200sx s13 with vg30det @ 1bar

Post Reply